Where the Comment is King

THE NEWS COMMENTER

VOTE  (0)  (0)

Why Martin Luther King Couldn't Get a Carry Permit

Added 10-27-21 12:21:02am EST - “Several groups urging the Supreme Court to overturn New York's virtual ban on bearing arms emphasize the policy's racist roots and racially disproportionate impact.” - Reason.com

CLICK TO SHARE

Posted By TheNewsCommenter: From Reason.com: “Why Martin Luther King Couldn't Get a Carry Permit”. Below is an excerpt from the article.

Jacob Sullum | 10.27.2021 12:01 AM

After his home was bombed in 1956, Martin Luther King Jr. applied for a permit to carry a gun. Despite the potentially deadly threats that King faced as a leader of the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott, the county sheriff, Mac Sim Butler, said no.

Next week the Supreme Court will consider a challenge to a New York law similar to the Alabama statute that empowered local officials like Butler to decide who could exercise the constitutional right to bear arms. The briefs urging the Court to overturn New York's statute include several from African-American organizations that emphasize the long black tradition of armed self-defense, the racist roots of gun control laws, and their disproportionate impact on racial and ethnic minorities.

"I went to the sheriff to get a permit for those people who are guarding me," King told fellow protest organizers at a February 1956 meeting. "In substance, he was saying, 'You are at the disposal of the hoodlums.'"

At the time, it was illegal in Alabama to carry a pistol "in any vehicle" or concealed on one's person without a license. The law said a probate judge, police chief, or sheriff "may" issue a license "if it appears that the applicant has good reason to fear injury to his person or property, or has any other proper reason for carrying a pistol."

Read more...

If you don't see any comments yet, congrats! You get first comment. Be nice and have fun.

Comment Box is loading comments...

CLICK TO SHARE

BACK TO THE HOME-PAGE