Where Your Speech Is Free And Your Comment Is King - Post A Link

THE NEWS COMMENTER

Screenshot Nytimes.com
VOTE  (0)  (0)

Trump's Secrecy Fight Escalates as Judge Rules for Congress in Early Test


Added 05-20-19 10:40:03pm EST - “A judge ruled that Trump’s accounting firm must turn over his financial records even as the White House told a former top Trump aide not to show up at a hearing.” - Nytimes.com

CLICK TO SHARE

Posted By TheNewsCommenter: From Nytimes.com: “Trump’s Secrecy Fight Escalates as Judge Rules for Congress in Early Test”. Below is an excerpt from the article.

WASHINGTON — The fight over President Trump’s systematic stonewalling of Congress escalated on two fronts on Monday, as a federal judge upheld a subpoena for his financial records even as the White House instructed its former top lawyer to defy a subpoena to testify before lawmakers.

In the first court test of Mr. Trump’s vow to resist “all” subpoenas by House Democrats, a judge ruled that his accounting firm, Mazars USA, must turn over his financial records to Congress — rejecting his lawyers’ argument that lawmakers had no legitimate power to demand the files.

Mr. Trump separately moved to block Congress from receiving testimony by the former White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II at a hearing scheduled for Tuesday, denying House Democrats one of the most important eyewitnesses to Mr. Trump’s attempts to obstruct the Russia investigation. Mr. McGahn will not appear, his lawyer said later.

The fights raise separate but overlapping issues: how far Congress’s power to subpoena information extends, what Mr. Trump can apply executive privilege to in order to keep secret, and whether a president’s senior aides are “absolutely immune” from subpoenas, meaning they do not even have to show up when ordered to appear before lawmakers.

Both disputes grew out of weeks of trading threats and rival interpretations of where to draw the line between the president’s power to keep information secret and Congress’s power to obtain records and testimony for oversight investigations.

Read more...

Post a comment.

CLICK TO SHARE

BACK TO THE HOME-PAGE