CLICK TO SHARE
President Trump, unsurprisingly, has floated the idea of delaying the election. If he had the power to suspend the election, I assume that he would use it. But he doesn't.
The election will not be delayed for political gain. The date of the election is set by statute. The Constitution unambiguously assigns this power to Congress: "The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States." U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl 4. Congress, meanwhile, "shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." Id. art. I, § 1. And the majority of members of the House of Representatives belong to the Democratic Party.
So, Congress almost certainly will not delay the election, and Congress almost certainly could not constitutionally cancel the election. And, by the way, even if the election were cancelled, President Trump would cease being the President after four years.
Those worried about this sort of thing worry that the Supreme Court might be complicit in an unconstitutional Executive Order to delay the election or just flat out cancel it. Or maybe worse, just a switch to a dictatorship until conditions allow democracy to be restored. Such a thing could happen in some countries. Not here. I do not believe that any such attempt would receive the support of a single Justice. Certainly, it would not receive the support of five Justices. Nor would it receive the support of the military. Nor would it receive the support of academic commentators or serious lawyers. Is there anyone who argues that the President does have the power to delay or cancel the election?
Can we imagine crazy scenarios that could lead to genuine constitutional crises? Sure. Imagine terrorist attacks being launched simultaneously across the United States, but selectively only in strongholds of the then-current President. In such a case, there might be legitimate arguments against the validity of any election results, and it is hard to speculate how such a crisis would be resolved.
If you don't see any comments yet, congrats! You get first comment. Be nice and have fun.
CLICK TO SHARE
COMMENTS VIA TWITTER
@glennkirschner2 THIS. Since being appointed by Trump (after giving Trump's campaign $1.2 MILLION of his own money… https://t.co/wkd67OToxC
Debate over voting by mail has been largely Trump attacks, Dems defend. But now there seems to be a new seriousness… https://t.co/lPoD3y1njs
In Opinion Fernando Cheung writes, "The Hong Kong authorities announced that the LegCo election would be delayed b… https://t.co/WKmDxwhPs9
RT @ByronYork: Debate over voting by mail has been largely Trump attacks, Dems defend. But now there seems to be a new seriousness about po…
RT @Mikel_Jollett: @glennkirschner2 THIS. Since being appointed by Trump (after giving Trump's campaign $1.2 MILLION of his own money), he…