CLICK TO SHARE
Posted By TheNewsCommenter: From Nydailynews.com: “Money, speech and truth: Citizens United critics fail to understand a fundamental reality about politics and freedom”. Below is an excerpt from the article.
Ten years ago today, a bogeyman was born. Its name is Citizens United, the Supreme Court ruling that struck down limits on independent corporate political spending and, liberal Cassandras say, ushered in a dystopian era in which big-money interests got official permission to buy democracy.
Quick history lesson: Citizens United was a nonprofit that, during the 2008 Democratic primaries, sought to air a 90-minute ideological documentary deeply critical of Hillary Clinton to Americans’ homes via pay-per-view. The Federal Election Commission barred its broadcast under rules enforcing the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
The Supreme Court faced a question: How could such a ban stand in a nation whose Constitution has a First Amendment forbidding government limitations on speech, and in which political speech is deemed the most privileged and protected form of expression?
How could it be that, in an act of expression no one would ever contemplate abridging, a for-profit corporation could in the thick of the 2004 presidential election release into theaters and advertise on television “Fahrenheit 9/11,” a strident anti-George W. Bush documentary, but the release of “Hillary: The Movie,” a photo-negative film, could four years later be criminalized?
And how could it be, as Theodore Olson argued before the court, that “it is a felony for a small, nonprofit corporation to offer interested viewers a 90-minute political documentary about a candidate for the nation’s highest office, that General Electric,” then owner of NBC, “National Public Radio, or George Soros may freely broadcast”? He could’ve added Fox News to the litany.
If you don't see any comments yet, congrats! You get first comment. Be nice and have fun.
CLICK TO SHARE