You are the news now

THE NEWS COMMENTER

VOTE  (0)  (0)

Kate Steinle's killer found incompetent to stand trial on gun charges


Added 02-15-20 08:35:02pm EST - “"We're against having him (found) incompetent. He could go away for an indefinite period."” - Hotair.com

CLICK TO SHARE

Posted By TheNewsCommenter: From Hotair.com: “Kate Steinle's killer found incompetent to stand trial on gun charges”. Below is an excerpt from the article.

The illegal immigrant who killed Kate Steinle in 2015 has been found mentally incompetent and therefore not able to stand trial on gun charges related to the case.

U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria said in a court order that a psychiatric evaluator had concluded Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate was not competent to stand trial “because of mental illness that is not presently being treated.”

Chhabria said he would meet with lawyers from both sides next week to discuss the next steps. If either side objects to the findings, a hearing would likely be required to examine Garcia-Zarate’s competency. If neither side disputes the findings, the court will discuss whether the defendant should be treated locally for mental illness or sent to a federal facility outside California.

Zarate was acquitted of the murder of Steinle in 2017 but was convicted on a charge of being a felon in possession of a gun. An alternate juror explained after the trial that the murder charge seemed like a stretch to jurors because the bullet bounced off the pavement. In theory, Zarate could have been convicted of manslaughter, but for that to happen the killing had to take place in connection with an underlying crime. In Zarate’s case, prosecutors said the underlying crime was brandishing the gun before it went off. That fit with some of Zarate’s own statements prior to the trial, i.e. that he was pointing the gun at sea lions before it went off. But prosecutors apparently never offered any evidence at trial that Zarate was brandishing the gun. The alternate juror suggested that if prosecutors had simply chosen possession of a firearm by a felon as the underlying crime (the one charge Zarate was convicted on), he would have been convicted of manslaughter.

However, Zarate appealed the gun conviction last January on the grounds that the judge had failed to instruct the jury he could be found not guilty if he was only temporarily in possession of the gun. Last September he won the appeal and his conviction was overturned. Now Zarate’s attorney says he will seek a second opinion on his client’s mental state:

Read more...

Anonymous comments are welcome, just check the "Comment Anonymously" box before submitting your comment. If you don't see any comments yet, congrats! You get first comment. Be nice and have fun.

CLICK TO SHARE

BACK TO THE HOME-PAGE