CLICK TO SHARE
RUSH: Oh, and the New York Times is back. Last week or maybe it was two weeks ago, the New York Times had this major expose on how all of the fake bots and things are working at Twitter and all. Remember that, Mr. Snerdley? And we were looking at it, “Yeah, we knew this a year ago.” But the reason the Times was focusing on it is because they’re threatened by Twitter and Facebook. People are getting news from Twitter and Facebook and not the New York Times. So the Times was engaging in news stories designed to destroy the credibility.
They’re back. They’re back with a another humongous story on the real danger of social media. The real danger! Besides what it’s doing by creating fake news, it is destroying your child’s psychology. Social media is destroying your child’s mental health, and the worst way they’re doing it is that social media is not using words. Graphics and videos — pictures and videos — are now becoming the primary way people are learning things, and the New York Times says — and they’ve got expert backup — this is horrible.
Even Silicon Valley is now beginning to recognize the problem. The creators, the inventors of Facebook and Twitter and all these social media sites are now acknowledging that they have created a bunch of addicts, and they’re primarily using pictures and the “like” button and the “retweet” button and people are becoming addicted. The story starts (summarized), “Put your phone down. Put it down. Leave it there until you get a message or an alert and don’t touch it.” How long can you go? How long can you ignore the little alert that tells you you just got a text message? How long can you go?
This is how the story opens trying to get you to prove to yourself — to understand — that you are a hopeless addict to your device. The New York Times, I’m telling you: They are on a full-fledged mission here to destroy social media and everything about it, which is prima facie evidence that they think they are really, really being damaged by it. And this piece today… The story today is comprised of many miniature pieces, and one of the miniature pieces focuses on the dangers inherent and the problems inherent in young people only learning from graphics, charts, videos, still-frame photos.
It’s not good, the absence of words on the internet, social media. Words are falling by the wayside. So the Times is worried that it’s not going to be able to persuade. The Times is worried that people are becoming addicted to things that the New York Times cannot offer, and they are engaged in an onslaught here to discredit it. I find it funny to watch. Many of us here warned people about social media I don’t know how many years ago in all these various ways, primarily the psychological effect of it.
Post a comment.
CLICK TO SHARE
COMMENTS VIA TWITTER
Well, I've tried: In person (too much of a coward) On social media (destroys friendships) Tinder (not after a flin… https://t.co/5EFNMAtpkw
RT @poetikinetic: theory: internet is killing us from the inside out... ppl fight for views while also self-snitchin, liking a pic electron…
theory: internet is killing us from the inside out... ppl fight for views while also self-snitchin, liking a pic el… https://t.co/Eo57c4ZDCZ