Election-meddling & 'good censorship': Google ‘pushes the boundaries till its hand gets slapped'
Added 07-17-19 01:37:01am EST - “Senate Republicans tore into Google, demanding accountability for its biased, election-skewing algorithms during a hearing, while Democrats ran interference, denying the company was censoring anyone ?" and suggesting it should.” - Rt.com
CLICK TO SHARE
"If Big Tech cannot provide us with evidence that it's not playing Big Brother with its vast immense powers, there's no reason Congress should give them a special subsidy with section 230," Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) warned, opening Tuesday's hearing on Google and Censorship through Search Engines. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act gives internet platforms legal immunity for content they host, so long as they make no editorial judgments about that content. Google, Cruz and his colleagues declared, had long since overstepped that boundary.
Admitting "The Good Censor," the infamous leaked document in which Google discusses how it "control[s] the majority of online conversations" having shifted the balance away from the "marketplace of ideas" model toward the "well-ordered spaces for safety and civility" model, was a real Google document, Google VP of government affairs and public policy Karan Bhatia dismissed it as marketing-speak. "The Good Censor" showed Google proudly assuming the mantle of "editor" and "publisher" – roles it is not permitted to perform while retaining section 230 protections. Bhatia was unable to explain away the document's damning content, shrugging it away as "thinking that's being done by a marketing team."
Bhatia's artful evasiveness lead Cruz to marvel at one point: "You're managing to be less candid than Mark Zuckerberg." His repeated appeals to Google's large size – 100,000 people – and (he insisted) heterogenous nature failed to deflect the determined questioning of conservative senators eager to drag answers out of Google's walled data fortress.
Cruz and Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) called for an independent third-party audit of Google's content moderation algorithms, a prospect that clearly unsettled both Bhatia and his defenders on the Democratic side of the aisle. Citing the company's cooperation with Chinese government demands for content censorship, Hawley asked, "Why would anyone believe you now when you say we don't ever impose an ideological agenda?"
"Democracy as originally conceived cannot survive Big Tech as currently empowered," researcher Robert Epstein warned the committee, describing how Google's "autocomplete" search suggestions can turn an even 50-50 split among undecided voters into a 90-10 split. "Google has likely been determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 percent of the national elections worldwide since at least 2015," he said, pointing out that the search engine's algorithms must by necessity put "one widget ahead of another – and one candidate ahead of another."
Post a comment.
Anonymous comments are welcome, just check the "Comment Anonymously" box before submitting your comment. Note: Comments are free and open until someone ruins it. Don't dox, promote violence, etc. Be nice and have fun.
CLICK TO SHARE